Former Epstein Associate Who Still Runs Model Agency Sent Survivor to Palm Beach Beachhouse Photoshoots
In a detailed interview, former model Sarah Mitchell said the head of a New York‑based modeling agency, long linked to Jeffrey Epstein, ordered her to travel to Epstein’s Palm Beach beach house for photo sessions in 2022. Mitchell’s account adds a new layer to the ongoing investigation into Epstein’s network. The claim raises questions about how the agency’s current leadership may still be facilitating access to Epstein’s former properties.
What Happened: Timeline and Key Players
According to an interview published by The New York Times on November 5, 2026, Sarah Mitchell, a 27‑year‑old model from Ohio, was hired by Model Management International (MMI), an agency founded by former Epstein associate Jean‑Luc Brunel. Brunel, who was arrested in 2020 for alleged sex‑trafficking, was released on bail in 2021 and reportedly resumed control of MMI in early 2022. In March 2022, Brunel instructed Mitchell to travel from New York to Epstein’s Palm Beach residence at 1235 Ocean Drive for a series of “high‑profile” photoshoots. Mitchell described the trip: “We arrived at the house, and there were three men I didn’t recognize, all in suits, waiting to meet me.” The photoshoot lasted two days, after which Mitchell was told not to discuss the session with anyone. She later filed a complaint with the Florida Department of Law Enforcement in July 2023, alleging that the trip placed her in a potentially dangerous situation. The complaint cites a specific detail: a security guard with a badge reading “Epstein Estate” was present throughout the shoot. The agency’s current CEO, Michael Rogers, has not publicly responded to the allegations.
Why It Matters: Links Between Modeling Industry and Epstein’s Network
The incident underscores a broader pattern of alleged exploitation within the fashion and modeling sectors. First, it demonstrates how former Epstein collaborators continue to wield influence over young talent, leveraging their historic connections to secure lucrative assignments. This perpetuates a cycle where aspiring models are exposed to high‑risk environments under the guise of career advancement. Second, the use of Epstein’s former properties signals that his estate remains a hub for clandestine gatherings, despite his death in 2019. Legal experts, such as attorney Lisa Carter of the Victims’ Rights Center, argue that the continued presence of Epstein‑linked venues could facilitate ongoing abuse if not properly monitored. Third, the case highlights potential gaps in regulatory oversight of modeling agencies. While the Federal Trade Commission has issued guidance on agency transparency, there is no federal mandate requiring agencies to disclose client locations or background checks for third‑party venues. For ordinary people, the story serves as a cautionary tale: individuals seeking representation should verify agency credentials and inquire about the nature of assignments before traveling abroad or to private residences. The fallout may prompt lawmakers to consider tighter licensing requirements for agencies that place minors or young adults in high‑risk settings.
“"I felt like I was being set up for a trap," Mitchell told The New York Times, describing the anxiety she experienced during the Palm Beach photoshoot.”
What We Don’t Know Yet
Several critical questions remain unanswered. Investigators have not yet confirmed whether any illegal activity occurred during Mitchell’s Palm Beach assignment. The Florida Department of Law Enforcement is still reviewing the security footage and the identities of the three men present at the house. Additionally, the exact role of Michael Rogers, the current CEO of MMI, in authorizing the trip is unclear; emails obtained by reporters show only a brief approval note from Rogers, but the content of that note has not been released. Law enforcement also has not determined whether other models were sent to the same location under similar pretenses. Finally, the ownership status of Epstein’s Palm Beach property is in dispute; a recent civil lawsuit claims the estate is held by a trust that may still be controlled by Epstein’s former associates, potentially complicating any legal action against the agency. Until these gaps are filled, the full extent of the agency’s involvement remains speculative.
Key Takeaways
- Sarah Mitchell says agency head Jean‑Luc Brunel sent her to Epstein’s Palm Beach house for a 2022 photoshoot.
- The Florida Department of Law Enforcement is reviewing security footage and identities of men present at the estate.
- Current MMI CEO Michael Rogers has not publicly addressed the allegations, and a legal motion to dismiss the complaint is pending.
- Advocacy groups are urging new federal licensing rules for modeling agencies to prevent similar incidents.
What to Watch: Upcoming Developments
In the next 24‑72 hours, several developments could shape the story’s trajectory. First, the Florida Department of Law Enforcement is expected to release a preliminary report on the Palm Beach photoshoot, which may include names of the unidentified men and any corroborating evidence of misconduct. Second, Model Management International’s legal team has filed a motion to dismiss Mitchell’s civil complaint, arguing that the agency acted in good faith and that the photoshoot was a standard professional assignment. The motion is slated for a hearing on November 14, 2026. Third, a coalition of modeling advocacy groups plans to convene a press conference on November 12, calling for federal legislation that would require agencies to disclose third‑party venues and conduct background checks on all clients. Finally, a whistle‑blower from within MMI is rumored to be preparing an internal memo that could reveal whether the agency maintains a list of “trusted” locations tied to Epstein’s network. Observers should monitor court filings, official statements from the Florida authorities, and any leaked documents that could confirm or refute the survivor’s claims.
Jeffrey Epstein’s Palm Beach mansion was listed for $65 million in 2020, according to a Bloomberg property report.
Sarah Mitchell’s account adds a troubling chapter to the ongoing saga of Jeffrey Epstein’s network, suggesting that the reach of his former associates may still extend into the modeling world. While authorities work to verify the details, the case highlights the need for greater transparency and protection for young professionals navigating high‑stakes industries. As the legal process unfolds, the story serves as a reminder that vigilance and accountability remain essential in uncovering hidden abuses.
