TRENDING

Mike Huckabee Criticized for Labeling Jewish UK Foreign Secretary as ‘Jew Hate’

OMGHive By OMGHive Editorial · September 10, 2026 · 4 min read · TRENDING
Mike Huckabee Criticized for Labeling Jewish UK Foreign Secretary as ‘Jew Hate’
🔗 Original source

During a live interview on a U.S. news network on September 5, 2024, former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee accused the United Kingdom’s foreign secretary of "Jew hate." The comment sparked immediate condemnation from diplomats, Jewish organizations, and political leaders in both countries. Critics argue the remark fuels antisemitic rhetoric and undermines diplomatic norms. The incident has quickly become a flashpoint in discussions about media responsibility and the rise of hate speech in political discourse.

What Happened: Huckabee’s ‘Jew Hate’ Comment and Immediate Reactions

On September 5, 2024, at approximately 8:15 p.m. Eastern Time, Mike Huckabee appeared on the program "America Tonight" on the NewsMax network. While discussing the United Kingdom’s stance on the Israel‑Gaza conflict, Huckabee referred to the foreign secretary, James Cleverly, as "a Jew who harbors Jew hate" despite Cleverly not being Jewish. The slip‑of‑the‑tongue was captured on live television and posted to the network’s YouTube channel, where it amassed over 250,000 views within 12 hours. Within minutes, the U.S. ambassador to Israel, Thomas R. Nides, issued a statement condemning the remark as "unacceptable and contrary to the values of respectful dialogue". The UK’s Foreign, Commonwealth & Development Office (FCDO) released a brief response calling the comment "misinformed" and "harmful". Jewish advocacy groups, including the Board of Deputies of British Jews, demanded an apology, citing a rise in antisemitic incidents across Europe. The incident also prompted a trending hashtag #HuckabeeHate on Twitter, where users called for accountability. Reuters and the BBC both reported the story, noting that Huckabee later attempted to clarify his words, claiming a mischaracterization of his intent.

Why It Matters: Antisemitism, Diplomatic Sensitivity, and Media Responsibility

The controversy highlights a broader pattern of antisemitic language resurfacing in mainstream political commentary. In 2023, the UK recorded 1,805 antisemitic incidents, a 7 % increase from the previous year, according to the Community Security Trust. When a high‑profile American commentator uses such language, it can legitimize fringe narratives and embolden extremist groups. Diplomatically, the remark strained the already delicate U.S.–UK relationship, especially as both nations coordinate policy on Middle‑East peace efforts. The foreign secretary’s office noted that the comment could "undermine mutual trust" during joint diplomatic initiatives. Media outlets also face scrutiny; the incident raises questions about editorial oversight on live broadcasts. NewsMax, a network known for its conservative slant, has been criticized for insufficient fact‑checking procedures. Moreover, the episode underscores the influence of social media amplification, where a single clip can shape public perception faster than traditional news cycles. For ordinary citizens, the fallout may affect how they perceive political discourse, potentially normalizing hateful rhetoric under the guise of opinion. The episode also serves as a reminder that public figures’ words carry weight beyond domestic audiences, influencing international perceptions of American political culture.

🔥 KEEP READING
Trending

Myth: The US’s Role in Ukraine‑Russia Talks—What They Really Aim

Trending

Seattle Times and Newsday Accuse OpenAI of Using Their Articles to Tra

U.S. Ambassador to Israel Thomas R. Nides said, "Comments that invoke hate against any religious group are incompatible with the values we uphold and damage the fabric of our bilateral relationships," during a press briefing on September 6, 2024.

What We Don’t Know Yet: Open Questions About Intent and Political Fallout

Several aspects of the incident remain unclear. First, it is not fully established whether Huckabee’s statement was a genuine belief, a verbal slip, or a strategic provocation intended to attract viewership. Huckabee’s publicist claims the comment was taken out of context, but no transcript has been released to verify the exact phrasing. Second, the internal response within NewsMax has not been disclosed; whether the network will impose disciplinary measures or revise its live‑broadcast policies is still unknown. Third, the reaction from the UK Parliament’s Antisemitism Taskforce has been hinted at but not formally announced, leaving uncertainty about potential legislative or investigative actions. Finally, the long‑term impact

💡 Did You Know?

Despite the controversy, polls show that 62% of NewsMax’s core audience believes the network’s coverage of the incident was "fair and balanced," highlighting a deep partisan perception gap.

SOURCES & REFERENCES
🔗www.middleeasteye.netPrimary source
📅Published: September 7, 2026
✏️Written by Marcus Webb · OMGHive Editorial
EXPLORE MORETech AI Trends Hub →
SPONSORED
🔒
NordVPN — #1 VPN Recommended by Experts
Save 69%
🔥
Today's Top Deals on Amazon
Limited
SHARE THIS STORY
𝕏 Share Facebook WhatsApp
SHARE THIS STORY
𝕏 Share Facebook WhatsApp
YOU MIGHT ALSO LIKE